Parents are getting ptsd from being in the family court!

A system broken and riddled with corruption.

Across the nation, the dysfunction within the family law system flourishes. Rules are ignored, laws are manipulated, and egos go unchecked. Unless a person has had the misfortune of being in the family court during a hearing day, everything they encounter and see before them is for the first time.

If you have been into court many times, you could recognize similar cases are ruled against differently. The first time this happens it will shock you.

That day you will learn that judges rule how they want. Rules are meant to be broken in this area of law because they’re very little oversight and the oversight that does exist often suffers from having an appearance of impropriety.

When a wrong is done in the family courts, it is motivated by a misplaced sense of justice or a financial reward is gained.

A person in authority who abuses their power by cruel and unjust treatment is motivated by a desire to exercise power and could care less about the law. A person who is looking for financial gain is looking to purchase expensive items to make themselves feel successful, good about themselves, and seen as a great person.

Often payment for the abuse of the law is done.

The parent is paying on a second mortgage, a vacation home, or a large expensive item like a boat of the judge, guardian ad litem, or an attorney. No one knows this is happening because a court order is needed. What judge would give a public citizen or the police the ok to go through payments of a judge’s accounts based on possible information or suspicion. If all judges are doing this, no way would they sign an order to look at another judge's account.

Employees of the family courts violate their Oath of Office and the Code of Judicial Conduct.

For corruption to continue, the judge gets assistance from other judges, attorney’s, as well as law clerks. When this happens you now have a conspiracy case better known as RICO. Here are some techniques judges use to commit crimes.

When a judge talks about a case with others.

A judge is not allowed to talk about any case and gain information or insight. When they do, they breach ex parte Communication rules, but ex parte communications are expected when their financial contributors or friends are opposite a case.

Another example is when a family court employee mediates issues with parents, they write formal written recommendations regarding child custody, visitations, and more. When the friend of the court employee discusses the outcome of the mediation with the judge, they violate ex parte laws. This kind of conversation takes place all the time in family court.

When a judge ignores the law.

The primary techniques used by corrupt judges is to simply ignore the law and rules against the party that was legally right. When a judge simply says "denied" but the law requires that judges provide a "findings of fact and conclusions of law" on their orders. A judge can’t rule that he thinks the defendant is lying, he must have evidence or a law to tell him how to write their order. The judge will claim a case “applies” to the situation when it does not support their ruling.

When judges allow a favored party to lie and cheat, they are ignoring perjury.

Judges are always under oath and are to never say or write anything that isn't true, or they commit perjury and a crime has been committed by the judge. If the judge claims you have said and done things that haven't happened, he commits perjury. Obstruct of justice occurs when the judge does nothing about it and accepts the perjury as if it was fact. Judges will ignore information by the unfavored party. The judge will ignore the issues, facts, statutes, and case law brought by the party not favored by the judge as well.

The judge provides no due diligence and states they are on a limited amount of time.

When the judge refuses to take reasonable steps in order to satisfy a legal requirement but will entertain menial complaints that have little to do with parental fitness, the judge has not done their due diligence. Judges listen to evidence of how a mother let a child eat ice cream for dinner or how a father let his 10-year-old watch a PG-13 movie.

The Judge will ignore issues that would be important to the case.

Another favorite technique is to simply ignore issues like how their rulings could not possibly be explained or a law provided that shows exactly what the authority the judge has. The judge will ignore tough issues of jurisdiction, failure to provide a speedy trial, and other laws.

Judge concealing evidence and will not allow it to be heard in the court.

When the favored party can file anything they choose, while the unfavored party filings are denied, the evidence is concealed, the truth is not allowed to be told. The judge will do this to sway the evidence to the favored party to make them look innocent. The unfavored party is denied the information needed to defeat the other party, and there is no record of this evidence or argument, so a party could not appeal and show the appeals court the truth.

The judge will block information so it can not go on the record and later come back to bite them.

When a party is denied questioning of witnesses or denied discovery, the judge has blocked information and possible evidence from coming forward.

A judge will tamper with evidence in different ways.

When evidence submitted for filing disappear. Judges keep their own file of court hearing etc. An easy way out is to state the information got lost, but information has case names etc on them. When the judge purposely did not add the information to the court record, the Judges is tampering with evidence.

When a judge knows another person, who is on the case being heard. Certain lawyers carry certain favor with certain judges. A friend of the judge, a person the judge sits on a public boar with, or an owner of a law school the judge works at. These are all friends of the judge and creates a conflict of interest for the party. Few lawyers will challenge a system that they themselves know to be unfair because they will lose every case for their future clients.

Judges are denying parents that have not purchased custody several rights and privileges that the law allows.

Here are a few of them:

Deny Constitutional Rights

Denied the right to due process.

Denied the right to call witnesses.

Denied the right to contact witnesses.

Denied the right to testify under oath.

Denied the right to introduce evidence.

Denied the right to cross-examine witnesses

Denied the right to file answers to motions filed by the other party.

Denied the right to a fair and impartial judge by the refusal to disqualify themselves from the case.

Like and follow our Facebook page for more information.